[boost] Re: Dangerous no_type-definition in signals_common.hpp

From: Daniel Spangenberg (dsp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-21 05:23:46

Hello Daniel!

Daniel Frey schrieb:

> Daniel Spangenberg wrote:
> > Just for your information: Further on, I checked all files beginning
> > from the directory
> > boost_1_30_0 with extensions from [*.hpp;*.cpp;*.h;*.c;*.inl] for either
> > no_type or
> > yes_type definitions, but did not find any further "personal"
> > definitions.

I must have been dreaming, when I wrote this ;-))

Daniel