From: Jonathan Biggar (jon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-21 18:52:13
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Russell Hind wrote:
>>Fair enough. My most common use is for automatically
>> ... do something
>> ... do some more
>> ... do something else
>>with possible a while-loop around the unlock/lock code. From this, I
>>have seen it as a coding error if I call lock without an unlock but
>>this probably isn't the same for everyone.
> This looks like a motivating example for scoped_unlock. :-)
Yes, I've long wanted that. Particularly when the second "do some more"
involves a "long" operation that you don't want to hold the lock while
it is pending.
-- Jon Biggar Floorboard Software jon_at_[hidden] jon_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk