|
Boost : |
From: Anthony Liguori (anthony_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-25 19:00:54
E. Gladyshev wrote:
>The library itself would be portable, the physical
>layer (Win32 or else) is specified as a data type with
>a bunch of static functions. It is similar to data
>type traits in STL. In other words the physical layer
>is a data type that is used as a template parameter.
>If you need to adopt the GUI/GDI template library to
>another system, all you'll need to do is to create a
>data type which defines the predefined traits.
>
>Here is a simple example of the Bitmap and ImageList
>templates and Win32 traits that demonstrates this
>idea. Note: I have not tried to compile this code yet.
>
>
>
See, the problem is the fundamental abstractions in GUI programming are
radically different. GUI programming in Unix for example is
_dramatically_ different from Windows. One needs to worry about things
like server side pixmaps instead of client side pixmaps and some of the
modern widget kits (like Gtk+) have a complex OO design.
Not to mention the fundamental difference between message-based GUIs
(like Win32) verses callback based GUIs (like X) verses signal/slot
based libraries (like Qt).
It's not impossible, but it's very very difficult.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk