From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-28 14:53:33
Brian McNamara <lorgon_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:38:01PM +0200, Miroslav Silovic wrote:
>> Well, nobody posted anything definite on FC++, which is a pity, since I
>> find this library potentially very useful. Here are some comments.
>> Caveat: I haven't extensively used the library, but I have quite a bit
>> of experience with functional programming. I won't comment on the naming
>> scheme or the docs - that was covered in the original post.
> I expect the docs are a big issue (as David Abrahams commented); most of
> the docs on the web site are aimed at an audience of researchers in
> functional programming. Over the next couple of weeks I will make
> documentation of the boostified version of FC++ that's aimed at a C++
> audience. Hopefully that will help.
That'd be great, but you could help us all along quite a bit by just
posting (links to) definitions of the specialized terms you use.
That would be a lot more expedient and I know it would be enough to
get me to evaluate FC++.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk