From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-29 11:45:06
Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> An experimental version of today's Win32 compiler status table is
> available at http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32.html
> Please look at the random library tests as an example. You should be
> able to click on the "fail" superscripts to see a note as to the
> specific status of each failure.
> This detailed accounting is intended to let Boost users, developers,
> release managers, and compiler vendors know more about test failures.
> Because of the human effort involved, it will only be possible to do
> this detailed accounting for compilers which have a small number of
> failures. I'm hoping that for the next Boost release we can set a
> release criteria of accounting for 100% of all tests on at least a few
1. What do humans have to do in order to produce this annotation?
2. I still strongly prefer the overall format that meta-comm has been
publishing. Can we integrate with that?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk