Boost logo

Boost :

From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-30 06:04:02

>is not defined for gcc. However, the following URL in the gcc bug
>leads me to believe that the macro should be set on for the appropriate
>versions of gcc. Matter of fact, I run with this problem myself and it
>can be
>workedaround with techniques similar to those employed for MSVC. See
>for instance definitions of get() and workaround_holder in


The issue with gcc seems to be a little more specific than we normally set
the macro for, but I don't see any reason why we shouldn't set it. Am I
right in thinking that this is specific to gcc 3.1 and 3.2? Also do you
have a test case that can be added to the appropriate config test?



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at