From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-01 16:55:51
> Are you aware that the pImpl idiom is used for many
> different things
It defenitly has its place but not in modern C++.
> or have
> you just decided its not modern C++ at all because
> you don't use it for the
> things you want to do ?
In my opinion modern C++ is more oriented toward
program specifications and generic (compile-time)
programming. In modern C++, the program functionality
can be customized by specifying custom data types and
using them in a generic way (library). It is more
like a type oriented programming not implementation
driven. pImpl doesn't fit there.
Don't get me wrong. I use pImpl myself but I try to
avoid it as much as possible.
I think that any industry standard TEMPLATE library
should be designed in terms of modern C++. The
compilation time should NOT be considred as an issue.
Compilers are getting better, computers faster...
boost should be setting programming standards not
laging behind trying to accomodate some specific h/w
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk