From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-02 07:09:17
At 02:48 AM 7/8/2003, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>minor nitpick: why signal.hpp instead of signals.hpp?
It is following the practice of the C++ Standard Library. Which in turn was
following the practice of the C Standard Library.
That being said, those libraries were developed in the days when filenames
were limited to very short lengths, and no concerns over header name
collisions. Today our concerns are different.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk