|
Boost : |
From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-04 15:32:58
--- Brock Peabody <brock.peabody_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> This saves us from having to find a representational
> scheme that will
> fit on top of an unknown number of platforms which
> might not have
> anything in common.
>
I think this is where we disagree. I prefer to find a
single low-level represntation scheme that could be
implemented on top of an unknown number of platforms.
The representation could be even expressed in terms of
a C API, it doesn't matter. The modern C++ layer will
use the single representation, and not worry about a
specific platform at all. The C++ layer will reside
in .h files completely.
If we do something like this, then our library will
support Rainer Deyke's requirements (see his post in
this thread).
Eugene
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk