From: Philippe A. Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-05 20:44:24
Joe Gottman wrote:
> They are considering a language solution. See this link:
Wow, that is good. I like the new syntax...
0,01$: But maybe they could add some template specifier before its
declaration; this could help typename / non-type arguments / template
template <... typename A>
void foo(A const &)
template <... long double A>
template <... template <typename> A>
foo<int, long, double>(1, 2, 3);
foo<1, 2, 3, 4, 5>();
foo<map, list, vector>();
0,01$: And they should rename 'the-return-type' to something else...
something like 'nameless' or 'holotype'.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk