Re: [boost] Re: Boost 1.31 release?

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-11 12:39:09

At 11:13 PM 8/10/2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:

 >Beman Dawes wrote:
 >> Assuming I'm release manager for 1.31.0, I'm going to publish explicit
 >> release criteria for key platform/compiler pairs. Basically, the
 >> criteria will be 100% accounting for all failures on those
 >> platform/compiler pairs.
 >
 >While I totally support the failures markup goal, I would like to see
 >_the_ release criteria to include "no regressions from the previous
 >release" item as well, preferrably for all non-beta compilers that are
 >currently under regression testing. Especially since now we have tools
 >to ensure it.

That sounds reasonable to me.

 >Especially since now we have tools to ensure it.

Damn. I forgot to bookmark the URL. Could you post it again please? Or 
better yet add something to boost-root/status/compiler_status.html linking 
to the permanent location. That in turn means deciding what of your 
experiment work is permanent and where it will live.

Thanks,

--Beman