Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Douglas Paul Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-11 18:11:07

Next message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Boost 1.31 release?"
Previous message: Petr Koèmíd: "[boost] config, workaround of bug in variant's compiler bug workaround on gcc"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Boost 1.31 release?"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Boost 1.31 release?"
Reply: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Boost 1.31 release?"

On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, David Abrahams wrote:
> According to your chart, the following libraries are all regressing:
> function
>
> Are these real regressions or just newly-tested compilers? Can the
> library authors/maintainers address these problems? Where is our
> maintenance wizard?

All of the failures for function are due to newly-tested compilers.

Doug

Next message: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Boost 1.31 release?"
Previous message: Petr Koèmíd: "[boost] config, workaround of bug in variant's compiler bug workaround on gcc"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Boost 1.31 release?"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Boost 1.31 release?"
Reply: David Abrahams: "[boost] Re: Boost 1.31 release?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk