Re: [boost] Re: boost/math octonion/quaternion failures?

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-13 10:24:42

At 09:57 AM 8/13/2003, Hubert Holin wrote:

 >Somewhere in the E.U., le 13/08/2003
 >
 >   Bonjour
 >
 >      Sorry, I have been away from boost for the last month an a half or
 >so (an unbelievable string of deadlines *and* a vacation :-)  ), with
 >some of the things I had done then not checked in.
 >
 >      I'll try to fix the Gcc problem today (or tomorrow morning at the
 >latest), but I fear that some of the work I did for special functions,
 >some of which are required by quaternions and octonions, might create
 >some new, more delicate, problems with older compilers (in other words,
 >Gcc 2.95.x might be out).
 >
 >      At any rate, I only have CodeWarrior locally available for tests
 >(but I will read the results of the various platform runs to fix
 >things), so it might prove inconvenient for the "imminent" release.

If there are new failures, is it OK if I try to fix them? I've got 8 
compilers, will have a pretty good idea if changes break anything.

--Beman