From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-14 14:29:53
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>Well, 3.4 isn't even a released compiler so As far as I'm concerned
>>it doesn't count.
I added 3.4 only for informational purpose. There is no
point in actively support a compiler that is still under
>>I'm not sure what you mean. If it doesn't say 1_30_0 in the page
>>it's probably a test of the HEAD revision.
> The page is: http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux.html
> So it should correspond to the HEAD revision.
> IIUC, the HEAD revision contains Jen's broken patch, so this one should fail.
> I wonder if the reports are swaped (the page titled 1.30.0 being the HEAD and viceversa)
No, I checked my scripts, they aren't swapped.
cs-Linux are the tests for cvs head.
cs-Linux-1.30.0 are the tests for 1.30.0 RELEASE.
cs-Linux-rc-1.30.0 are the tests for the RC_1_30_0 branch.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk