[boost] Re: trouble with static linking and intel-linux

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-15 13:41:42

Samuel Krempp <krempp_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams a écrit :
>
>>Yes, that's the problem.  There is another way:
>>
>>  rule format-rtlink ( toolset variant : properties* )
>>  {
>>      if [ MATCH .*(metrowerks).* : $(toolset) ] ||          [ MATCH
>> .*(cwpro).* : $(toolset) ]
>>      {
>>         return <runtime-link>static $(properties) ;
>>      }
>>      else
>>      {
>>         return <runtime-link>dynamic $(properties) ;
>>      }
>>  }
>>
>>Now add format-rtlink to the requirements.
>>
>
> this sounds perfect. I couldnt have come up with this myself . But I
> had planned to read the docs about bjam and Boost.Build in depth when
> V2 comes out, so one day, I'll know how to write advanced Jamfiles too
> !  :)
>
> Unfortunately, I left home again and I'd have a hard time commiting
> changes to the boost cvs where I am now.
> can you please make the changes to
> $Boost/libs/format/tests/Jamfile  and commit ?
>
> oh, and while you're at it,
>  the ios_state regression tests need the same treatment, and I think
>  they are launched via
> $Boost/status/Jamfile..    ;-)
>
> That would probably fix the 2 intel-linux-7.1 regressions and
> hopefully allow for 1.30.2 release..

OK, I did it.  If we could have one more round of RC_1_30_0
regression testing I would be very appreciative.  Thanks.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com