From: Daniel Spangenberg (dsp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-19 03:40:16
Since I see strong activities in overworking parts of the documentation,
would like to remember the open question concerning the help text
"Separate, Explicit Instantiation"
During the summer pause I discussed some problems concerning this
usage of the operator class templates without inheritance (I.e. without
CRTP) in the thread
"Non-standard feature proposed in help text of operators library??"
with Daniel Frey and David Abrahams. Although my original critic
was not well-explained on my side and resulted in some misunderstandings
among the "discussees" I think, that we can be assume, that the current
text proposes a non-standard feature and should be either removed or
declared as "non-portable".
If you don't think that this statement holds true, please clarify why.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk