Re: [boost] Any progress in bit_iterator?

From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-19 05:33:06

--- Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Note that you can't work on "raw memory" in the sense
> that you ignore the type of the objects and treat them as sequences of
> unsigned chars: that's because you could end up treating padding bits = 1 as
> "real bits" (value bits).

Well, that could be exactly the intent, but not always :-)

Genny.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com