Re: [boost] stlport & gcc support

From: Russel Hill (russh347_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-20 08:15:06

Martin Wille wrote:

> Yes, that is why I didn't add more STLport configurations to the
> tests, yet. However, STLport's support for debugging is certainly an
> interesting feature to use for many developers. So, there would still
> be good use for STLport with recent gcc versions.

This is exactly our situation.  Our target applications actually run on 
an embedded coldfire board.  At this point, we're constrained to a 
gcc-2.95 derived toolchain, no stlport, and no boost ... on the target 
platform.  As time allows, we will be looking into the later toolchain 
and uClinux distributions.  For now we use STLport to support our 
development environment, simulation, and testing.  STLport assertion 
failures are fairly rare occurrances, but well worth the investment when 
they do happen.