From: John Torjo (john.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-21 07:10:44
> I am a bit surprised that Boosters themselves do not seem to want to
> one of their own key libraries. Maybe because I am used to the C++
> callback and event systems invented by Microsoft and Borland for their
> frameworks, anything less or more restricted seems primitive to me. That
I have to disagree with you. It's quite an overhead to use boost::function.
In the SMART_ASSERT library I'm developing, the first version used
boost::function - compile-time were huge.
Step by step I removed different things (amongst which the boost::function),
and now I can live with the current compilation time.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk