Boost logo

Boost :

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-21 12:49:13

"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> [...]
> Pretty much. See
> or
> boost/more/license_info.html in your CVS tree.

Does the license itself have a copyright which must be acknowledged?
I guess it seems like worrying about a license for a license enters
into a world of recursive absurdity that only a lawyer would dare to
enter, but mainly I'm wondering if this part:

Boost Software License - Version 1.0 - August 17th, 2003

must appear with the rest of the license or not. It seems odd to have
a license version and date appear with the license (first time I've seen
it, anyway), but if that is the proper form, so be it.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at