From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-27 23:53:46
> Wednesday, August 27, 2003, 8:21:59 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> The implementation is fine, AFAICT. The only problem with me is the
>> comment: I couldn't understand it for the first time because "none *it"
>> sounded confusing. Maybe "*it is never equal to u" is better?
> You're right, my english is terrible.
>> BTW, if you could sumbit unified diff instead of new implementation, that
>> would be nice. If that's not convenient for you, no problem. I can apply
>> the thange anyway.
> Patch is attached.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk