From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-28 12:41:39
On Thursday 28 August 2003 01:23 pm, David Abrahams wrote:
> The other possible option would have been to simply not give the user
> a readable error message. I'm open to opinions that I chose the
> wrong balance.
So we're breaking code in order to produce a better error message? This seems
like the wrong trade-off to make, especially because it means it breaks code
when users upgrade from VC6 to VC7; but we want them to upgrade!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk