From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-29 14:34:18
--- Gregory Colvin <gregory.colvin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The C++ standard requires that a copy of an allocator is equivalent
> to the original.
> Right. If your allocators can't be copied safely then you have a
> problem. Peter's approach is one way to fix the problem. But I
> don't see that shared_ptr has a problem.
All I am trying to say is that shared_ptr doesn't specify
any requirements on its Deleter parameter.
shared_ptr's Deleter is not a C++ standard's allocator.
shared_ptr *does* have a problem because it doesn't set
any standards for the Deleter type like C++ does for
It is just one example of the inconsistent memory
management concept in boost that should be
sorted out eventually.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software