From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-31 13:52:58
"Joel de Guzman" <djowel_at_[hidden]> writes:
> What I am trying very hard to say is to stick to only *ONE* interface
> and one concept.
Optional is a container. I've never seen a container in C++ which didn't
have both a value interface and an element-access interface. How do
you propose to achieve that with optional?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk