|
Boost :
|
- Next message: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Re: Optional, tie, and iterator_adaptor"
- Previous message: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Re: Optional, tie, and iterator_adaptor"
- In reply to: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Re: Optional, tie, and iterator_adaptor"
- Next in thread: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Re: Re: Optional, tie, and iterator_adaptor"
- Reply: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Re: Re: Optional, tie, and iterator_adaptor"
Fernando Cacciola <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> First of all, let's not confuse syntax with semantics.
> optional<> HAS strict value semantics.
No it does not. The accessors have pointer behavior!
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
- Next message: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Re: Optional, tie, and iterator_adaptor"
- Previous message: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Re: Optional, tie, and iterator_adaptor"
- In reply to: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Re: Optional, tie, and iterator_adaptor"
- Next in thread: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Re: Re: Optional, tie, and iterator_adaptor"
- Reply: Fernando Cacciola: "[boost] Re: Re: Re: Optional, tie, and iterator_adaptor"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk