Boost logo

Boost :

From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-02 00:12:21

--- Gregory Colvin <gregory.colvin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Apropos of which, I now think that the Boost UserAllocator requirements
> should be the default for components that parameterize how they use
> memory, with the Standard Allocator requirements being used only for
> components that need what they offer: a potentially very efficient way
> to allocate large numbers of small objects of known type, and/or a
> way to access storage via proxied pointers.

Perhaps the boost allocator requirements should just combine
both, the UserAllocator and StandardAllocator requirements.
In a way, StandardAllocators can be considered as
an extension of UserAllocators.


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at