From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-02 08:51:58
At 05:17 PM 9/1/2003, Daniel Frey wrote:
>On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:19:24 +0200, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>> On Thursday 28 August 2003 08:20 am, Daniel Frey wrote:
>>> utility/tie was moved to tuple, so should we remove the obsolete
>>> docs/references in utility now?
>> Please do.
>Done. I also updated the "Revisited ...", but there is some checksum in
>the HTML-source. I have no clue what it's good for, so if I broke it,
>please fix it and tell me how to avoid it next time :o)
The checksum is used by some HTML editors to automatically timestamp
revisions. It is in a comment and it doesn't hurt to break it if you happen
to edit the file manually. So you don't need to worry about it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk