Re: [boost] Re: Serialization Library Draft # 10

From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-04 11:29:40

At Thursday 2003-09-04 07:49, you wrote:
> > Hi Robert!
> >
> > I'm looking at the docs right now and so far it looks _far_ better than 
> anything I'v seen
> > before.
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > A small nit-pick:
> >
> > The pointer example uses a for-loop construct of the form:
> >
> > for(i = 0; i++ < 10;)
> >
> > unless there's some clause elsewhere, according to 5.4, the result of 
> the expression (i++ <
>10)
> > is unspecified (there's no sequence point between the operators)
> >
>Sorry... I thought these operators had the same precedence, but ++ has 
>higher precedence so it
>comes first.

one of us is clearly missing something ..... when the ++ happens is 
irrelevant  i++ has a _value_ of i BEFORE the ++.

>There's still something wrong with the example though:
>the first
>   stops[i]
>index from 1 (because 'i' is 1 already when the body is entered)
>
>Fernando Cacciola
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"