From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-04 19:27:05
"Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 15:27:24 -0400, David Abrahams wrote
>> This is causing an ambiguity:
>> using namespace boost::date_time;
> Right, you don't need the line above.
I do if I don't want to qualify Jan, don't I?
>> using namespace boost::posix_time;
>> time_duration since_1970 = d - 1/Jan/1970;
> ^^^^^^ joel's extension I presume?
>> The error was:
>> ... detail omitted...
>> Is it really right for us to have two time_durations? I never
>> expected this since boost::date_time::time_duration is nowhere
> The way to think of namespace date_time is 'detail' for now. I expect to
> document it more fully in the future.
Where is Jan located?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk