Re: [boost] date_time -> ptime

From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-04 18:57:12

Philip Miller <pwmiller_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Jeff Garland wrote:

>> I believe that Dave is asking for a non-explicit constructor for
>> ptime from date.  But he is also using an expression template extension
>> to allow the 1/Jan/1970 to compile.
> 
> I have grown to dislike non-explicit constructors, 

Why?

> so I like the current
> interface.  I also greatly prefer the syntax of date(1970,1,1) to 1/Jan/1970.

No problem, you can have either or both.

-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net