From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-09 12:55:35
"Hamish Mackenzie" <hamish_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Here is a quick go at optional as a container that holds just one item.
> I prefer it to the current boost::optional interface....
An example where this interface fits better than current one?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk