From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-11 10:20:40
On Thursday 11 September 2003 09:36 am, Daniel Frey wrote:
> This new idiom should be as safe as the current one, but it uses a real
> operator bool() for bool conversion, so no overhead can slip in. To be
> fair, it also has one drawback: The error message a user receives when
> converting a shared_ptr to int, float, ... is not as nice as today.
My only remaining concern with the new idiom is that it breaks is_convertible.
With the member function pointer version,
is_convertible<something_bool_testable, int>::value == false; with the
private conversion to an integral type, this results in a compiler error.
I don't know what to do about this, or if it will break much user code, but it
will break some code.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk