From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-11 11:48:15
Richard Hadsell <hadsell_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>>I think that the actual difference is small to nonexistent, but if this
>>issue is considered important, we can switch from a member function pointer
>>to a data member pointer as the unspecified bool type. ...
> If the data member would add to its memory footprint, the result would
> be even less palatable. Memory is as important as performance for my
> app, and more important than syntactic beauty.
You don't need an actual member to form a null data member pointer.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk