From: Brock Peabody (brock.peabody_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-13 10:37:58
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> On Behalf Of JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z
> I hope I made myself clear, the issue is rather messy. Conclusion
> is that I'd rather keep these aliases. I'm open to discussion, though
Yes, your reasons for the aliases make sense.
> Looks good! What is the library aimed at?
I wanted to provide a seamless way to serve and call functions remotely.
For the client it should provide an interface as close to a normal
function call as possible. The server shouldn't have to do anything but
provide the required set of functions (or function objects).
> Planning on boosting it?
I'd have to boost my TCP/IP library first :)
> No standard name that I know of. We could call it "tagged types" :)
Well, I'm sure that if your library becomes part of boost we'll see the
"tagged type" technique used more frequently.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk