|
Boost : |
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-17 15:58:59
At 01:55 PM 9/17/2003, Peter Dimov wrote:
>Beman Dawes wrote:
>> Sorry, I haven't been clear. It is a "stable link" to a specific
license
>> that would be a disaster. It would negate our objective of having a
>> single Boost license for all Boost libraries, because when the (even
>> though rare) license changes occur, there would be sure to be some
>> copyright holders who weren't reachable, and thus the licenses would
>> diverge. Some would be version 1, some version 2, and so forth.
>
>We have this exact situation right now, by the way.
Yes, very much so. Moving to a single license should be a big improvement
compared to the present situation where there are effectively many
licenses.
--Beman
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk