Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-18 18:16:03

Next message: Edward Diener: "[boost] Re: Proposal for Boost.Signals order of slots"
Previous message: Rodolfo Lima: "[boost] Re: Linker error with lambda and VC7.1"
In reply to: Jaakko Jarvi: "[boost] Progress on boost::enable_if?"
Next in thread: Eric Friedman: "[boost] Re: Progress on boost::enable_if?"

Jaakko Jarvi <jajarvi_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Enable_if is in the review queue.
> There is an implementation in sandbox (utility/enable_if.hpp)
> in the meantime. Any hints as to how to increase portability
> are appreciated.

Is it posible to have another (fast, express lane) review queue for
small libraries (actually, it is a utility instead of a library) such as
enable_if.hpp? We need the enable_if and we need it now.
I'm using the one in the sandbox.

Thanks!

-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net

Next message: Edward Diener: "[boost] Re: Proposal for Boost.Signals order of slots"
Previous message: Rodolfo Lima: "[boost] Re: Linker error with lambda and VC7.1"
In reply to: Jaakko Jarvi: "[boost] Progress on boost::enable_if?"
Next in thread: Eric Friedman: "[boost] Re: Progress on boost::enable_if?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk