From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-21 09:18:09
On Friday 19 September 2003 05:45 pm, Edward Diener wrote:
> Douglas Gregor wrote:
> > Well, you're not the only one that wants this capability :) Herb
> > Sutter wrote an article on function, and that was his main
> > criticism/suggestion.
> Yes, I read it. I was also under the impression that some work was being
> done to distinguish boost::functions but maybe I heard it wrong.
We've still not found any solutions that really work.
> Essentially then you have added one more connect for front_or_back and
> added another parameter at the end.
Lexically speaking, yes. I'm concerned about the potential confusion when we
have two very similar concepts used in the same function. But I guess we
won't know unless we put it in and get lots of user questions about it (or,
we leave it out and someone asks if they can do it...).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk