Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-22 12:24:14

At 09:55 PM 9/21/2003, Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:

> Maybe the license would be clearer this way:

I think we are past the point of wording changes for clarity. Every wording
change causes a several weeks delay while we contact the lawyers and
discuss the ramifications. After every change, we then have to wait a
further length of time to see if any Boosters come up with serious

So unless someone comes up with a killer problem, I think we need to go
with the license as it currently appears in CVS. That wording has been
stable for a month or more, and I think most of the people who have
commented have been positive. I know the sentences are longer than any of
my English teachers would have approved of, but several attempts to clarify
the wording have floundered.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at