[boost] Re: parametrize smart_ptr deletion behavior

From: Tobias Schwinger (schwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-25 15:00:09

[ My last post got cut off accidently - sorry ]

> It is - but only in the shared_ptr

Applying the same mechansim to the other templates would be not a bad idea.

The part of my suggestrion about eliminating scoped_array to be a
parametrized
scoped_ptr was not a good idea, because it would imply an operator T*().
This might be ok for (and only for) the scoped_ptr and therefore reduce the
consistency among the templates' design.