|
Boost : |
From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-27 20:50:12
At 02:57 2003-09-28, Howard Hinnant wrote:
>>In that case, couldn't you allocate the scoped_lock dynamically and move it
>>when copying?
>
>I was really hoping to avoid heap allocation on this one.
Even if it's pooled? Something like this:
locked_ptr<X> singleton()
{
static X x;
static locker_pool p;
return locked_ptr<X>(&x, p.allocate());
}
(sample implementation attached)
--- Daniel Wallin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk