Re: [boost] Re: Re: shifted_ptr review

From: Gregory Colvin (gregory.colvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-29 18:01:35

On Monday, Sep 29, 2003, at 16:46 America/Denver, Philippe A. Bouchard 
wrote:

> Gregory Colvin wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> - What are the semantics for the various collector_traits options? I
>>>> see rc_collector, gc_collector, and os_collector: what the semantics
>>>> of these three collectors, and how do they compare to each other? To
>>>> shared_ptr?
>>>
>>> Those semantics are defined at compile-time for a given class,
>>
>> Yes, yes.  But what *are* those semantics?
>
> Yes, they are proposals and do not exist yet

Oh.

>  but they could be easily
> removed; making place to pure garbage collection.  This would depend 
> on your
> preferences.

If you want to leave the collector_traits in place you will need to
specify the requirements on the traits classes.