From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-30 16:37:44
"Fredrik Blomqvist" <fredrik_blomqvist_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Looks good! I believe this is a highly needed complement to generic code.
> A question though: Have you considered using separated-traits instead? (see
> for example the new iterator_traits code by David Abrahams)
> Like so:
> etc ....
> Philosofically I'd say this would be more in-line with the Open Closed
> Principle. (and IIRC David Abrahams also raised the idea of refactoring
> boost::call_traits into separate traits-classes a while ago.)
Yes, it's important to do it that way for many reasons, not least of
which is MPL interoperability.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk