Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-01 09:56:17


Samuel Krempp <krempp_at_[hidden]> writes:

> If I got it right, Robert is reluctant to have deserialization require
> default-constructability, even private

I certainly agree that it's a nasty constraint. I think I can see
only one way to achieve non-intrusive deserialization in portable C++:
the deserialization function gets an address into which the object
will be constructed with placement new. The main downside of this
approach is that it becomes difficult to deserialize subobjects.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk