From: Philippe A. Bouchard (philippeb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-01 14:11:58
Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
>>> As it stands my vote it to reject this submission. Later on
>> it could
>>> be implemented as specific PBSP policy.
>> And that would make it acceptable?
> Yes. As another custom policy for generic framework.
Do you want me to continue documenting shifted_ptr as it is? Do you think
the framework will be able to share different allocations between different
pointers? Theoretically speaking I wouldn't know how to pass on an object
allocated with make_share_ptr<>() to a shifted_ptr<> as it is. There shall
be overhead somewhere.
I am not yet familiar with every details, my apologies if I am missing
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk