Boost logo

Boost :

From: Philippe A. Bouchard (philippeb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-01 14:11:58

Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:


>>> As it stands my vote it to reject this submission. Later on
>> it could
>>> be implemented as specific PBSP policy.
>> And that would make it acceptable?
> Yes. As another custom policy for generic framework.

Do you want me to continue documenting shifted_ptr as it is? Do you think
the framework will be able to share different allocations between different
pointers? Theoretically speaking I wouldn't know how to pass on an object
allocated with make_share_ptr<>() to a shifted_ptr<> as it is. There shall
be overhead somewhere.

I am not yet familiar with every details, my apologies if I am missing


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at