From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-01 15:57:55
David Abrahams wrote:
> I had heard Andrei did something like this a while ago, but I missed
> the details until just now, when I stumbled across the article at
Sorry, but this is kinda "Most Famous King of Trolls" article. Really.
c.l.c++.mod: (Subject: Re: volatile -- what does it mean in
relation to member functions?)
> I was a
> little disappointed at first because I always imagined something much
> more sophisticated, but the simplicity of Andrei's technique is also
> its beauty. I wonder if it makes sense for us to implement:
> a. A coding guideline in which threadsafe member functions are
> b. Some infrastructure similar to his LockingPtr
Andrei[/CUJ] should really pull it off.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk