From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-04 05:36:33
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure, but I'm unwilling to believe that it works until it has
> > been tested with all combinations of intel compilers, MS compiler
> > compatibility, dinkumware libs, and command-line/IDE integration.
> > There were real reasons that the config has evolved to the point
> > where it is today.
> I think so - I just said that the current Boost release
> definitely DOESN'T work under MSVC 6 + Intel anymore without manual
> I don't know how important this configuration is among the others.
We've been through endless bouts of thrashing with this config - Beman Dawes
checked in the changes you mentioned - so I'm cc'ing him on this one.
Also we shouldn't be using _WCHAR_T_DEFINED as a check in the header,
because that gets set by the windows headers even if wchar_t isn't a native
I suspect we will get complaints whatever :-(
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk