From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-05 16:59:22
David Abrahams wrote:
> I'm pretty proud of myself (;->)
> but I'm not too satisfied with how
> much code is required for someone wanting to write a new function
> accepting keyword arguments, and further I'm not sure how to design a
> good interface for automatically generating the boilerplate with the
> preprocessor. Consider that there may be initial non-keyword args,
> which might themselves be templated or not.
> I thought I'd open it up for suggestions. Thoughts, anyone?
Can't the number of overloads needed be reduced by using default
arguments of type nil? This should work as long as the positional
arguments aren't non-const references.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk