[boost] Re: volatile and thread-safety

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-06 03:49:58

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[...]
> Now you might not agree with the model of object-level locking, and indeed
> it falls short for transactions involving multiple objects. Is that the
> case? 

Yep. http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3ED22764.AA45A8DE%40web.de

>       In that case locking_ptr can never have any value because it helps
> object-level locking only.

Yup. http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3D52CD8A.1070009%40tellabs.com

regards,
alexander.