From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-07 07:53:56
Beman Dawes wrote:
> At 10:44 AM 10/6/2003, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> >the regression status table contains:
> > utility indirect_iterator_example pass
> >(where "utility" is the library name and "indirect_iterator_example" is
> >name of the test).
> >but "indirect_iterator_example" is declared in
> >so I'm not sure it's from "utility" library. Is this a problem with
> >testsuite/reporting programs or this is intended?
> Well, it is a question of which library. The test program
> indirect_iterator_example.cpp lives in the libs/utility tree. The target
> is in the libs/iterator tree. The reporting program right now assumes the
> test program location determines the library name. We can change that, but
> that may be fixing the symptom rather than the cause.
> A better solution might be to move the iterator example files to the
> iterators library (libs/iterator/...) hierarchy.
I think this is the best solution, ultimately. I wonder who's to make the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk