From: Eric Friedman (ebf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-07 20:54:00
E. Gladyshev wrote:
> --- Eric Friedman <ebf_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>In my opinion, the ability to turn off heap backup for variant should be
>>seen as an optimization (i.e., as it prevents costly heap allocation)
>>and not any sort of interface feature. Please disagree with me though.
> The problem is that the user might turn no/off the heap
> backup inadvertently by simple specifying an 'int'
> as the first type. So in generic context, the variant
> protection (with the heap backup) is unpredictable.
* Heap backup is on by default. Why would it matter if the user
inadvertently turns it off?
* What exactly do you mean by "variant protection"? The reason heap
backup can be turned off in certain cases is because it is *not needed*
in those cases. The guarantees made by variant are always the same.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk